HLT Ontology Stack Architecture
The HLT Ontology Stack forms the foundational data engineering and semantic layer behind all HLT tools — including PatternLens, TimeMachine, behavioral clustering, entity resolution and large-scale blockchain forensics.
It transforms raw blockchain data (blocks, transactions, scripts, signatures, UTXOs…) into a queryable, semantically rich knowledge graph that enables complex pattern detection, counterfactual simulation and high-precision address clustering.
Core Layers of the Ontology Stack
-
Raw Data Layer
Full archival node data + parsed transaction graphs, script decompilation, sighash computation, Taproot/SegWit/P2TR support. -
Structural Ontology Layer
Formal definitions of Bitcoin concepts: UTXO, address clusters, entity threads, coin control heuristics, change detection, dust consolidation patterns. -
Behavioral & Temporal Ontology
Models for miner behavior, wallet fingerprinting, HODL vs. spender profiles, fee-market dynamics, adoption curves, reorg patterns. -
Signature & Cryptographic Fingerprint Layer
Integration with PatternLens: nonce bias detection, lattice attacks, deterministic nonce sequences, r-value collisions, weak RNG clusters. -
Simulation & Counterfactual Layer
Hooks into TimeMachine: alternate difficulty algorithms, subsidy curves, selfish-mining scenarios, forced reorgs, lost-coin revival simulations. -
Inference & Attribution Engine
Probabilistic entity resolution, multi-heuristic clustering, cross-chain linkage (where applicable), real-world attribution vectors.
The entire stack is designed with one guiding principle:
Don't trust — verify.
By building a semantically deep, cryptographically grounded ontology, HLT can answer questions no standard blockchain explorer ever could — from historical what-ifs to active key-recovery opportunities.
Introduction to PatternLens
PatternLens is HLT Software’s unique pattern recognition technology, specifically designed to reveal hidden structures, behavioral clusters, and recurring signatures across the entire Bitcoin blockchain.
The name PatternLens symbolizes exactly what it does: acting as a powerful “lens” that makes otherwise invisible patterns in the blockchain clearly visible – much like a microscope reveals hidden details to the trained eye.
Structural Fingerprints & Key/Signature Patterns
This represents the technical core of PatternLens when it comes to key-recovery capabilities.
ECDSA signatures consist of the pair (r, s), where:
r = (k × G).x mod n
PatternLens systematically searches for recurring patterns in signatures that enable private key recovery or de-anonymization:
-
Nonce Reuse
When the same nonce k is reused across two different signatures, the identical r-value appears. This creates a solvable linear equation system, allowing full private key recovery.
priv = (s₂ · z₁ − s₁ · z₂) / (r · (s₁ − s₂)) (mod n)
Visualization concept: In the transaction graph, two signature pairs sharing the same r-value are connected by a prominent red edge → immediate recovery path flagged by PatternLens. -
Weak / Linear Nonce Bias
When nonces exhibit partial predictability or truncation (common in flawed RNG implementations), PatternLens applies lattice reduction techniques to solve the Hidden Number Problem across multiple signatures.
Visualization concept: Scatter plot of r/s values (or derived nonce estimates) reveals visible lines, clusters or alignments → strong indicator of a defective nonce generator (e.g. truncated nonces, bad entropy). -
Deterministic Nonce Patterns
Deviations from RFC 6979 or custom RNG implementations often produce repeating or predictable r-sequences. PatternLens detects these recurring patterns across large sets of signatures from the same entity.
And yes — we possess a whole arsenal of further, genuinely unique recovery techniques…
the kind we never talk about in public.
By combining signature forensics with graph-based behavioral clustering, PatternLens turns seemingly random ECDSA values into powerful structural fingerprints — often the decisive link between pseudonymous addresses and real-world recovery opportunities.
TimeMachine – Counterfactual Blockchain Simulation
TimeMachine is HLT’s internal blockchain simulation engine. It goes far beyond replaying history — it allows active modification of the Bitcoin blockchain (or parts of it) and detailed observation of the resulting consequences.
A true “What-if” powerhouse — much more capable than any public blockchain explorer, replay tool or academic simulator.
Core Idea
Start from a real historical snapshot (e.g. block height 50,000 in 2010, 300,000 in 2014, …) and systematically alter chain parameters, actor behaviors and explicit events — then watch live how the chain would have evolved.
Control Layers
Properties (chain-level parameters)
- Change difficulty adjustment logic (different algorithms / parameters)
- Modify block size limit / weight units / SigOps limits
- Shift halving intervals
- Alter initial reward, subsidy curve, inflation schedule
- Modify checkpoint or assume-valid rules
Behaviours (stochastic actor models)
- Mining: hashrate distribution, pool strategies, selfish-mining ratio, fee-sniping
- Wallet & user: coin age, HODL rate, UTXO management, consolidation patterns
- Transaction mix: sizes, OP_RETURN usage, multi-sig prevalence, dust rate
- Adoption curves (active addresses, tx volume growth)
- Reorg probabilities & chain-tip dynamics under stress
Actions (explicit interventions)
- Insert / remove / redirect large transactions or batches
- Mark blocks / txs invalid → force fork / reorg
- Simulate hashrate jumps / outages at specific times
- Trigger hardfork / softfork activation at chosen heights
- Quantify & revive / remove lost keys / lost coins
Typical Use Cases
- Historical forensics & counterfactuals
“What if difficulty adjustment was different in 2011?”
“What if 20–30% more miners selfish-mined?” - Risk & stress-testing of proposals
Test BIPs, forks, SegWit / Taproot under real historical conditions - Economics & game-theory
Impact of subsidy curves on hashrate, fees, security budget - Entity & address validation
Test alternative clusterings against real chain compatibility
Technical Highlights
- Accurate Bitcoin VM re-implementation (Script, SigChecks, Taproot, …)
- Parallel execution of multiple alternate chains
- Comparison metrics vs. real chain: tip distance, cumulative work, fee curves, UTXO size, cluster stability, …
- AI-assisted realistic miner & user behavior models
TimeMachine is not a toy.
It is a forensic and strategic instrument to understand — and actively re-think Bitcoin history.
Example questions we routinely answer internally:
“What would have happened if Satoshi had moved all coins in 2010?”
“How would the chain have reacted to a radically different halving schedule?”